Ignorance Is Not Bliss
Intellectual laziness in the Muslim world holds
us back from real reform and progress
By Kashif Pirzada
We all know that Muslim scholars led the world in a variety of fields
a millennium ago. That fact is pointed out repeatedly by our beleaguered
leaders to defend our faith and civilization. But very few Muslims
question how or why those Muslims were different from Muslims today.
What made the scientists of that golden age want to seek out and translate
entire libraries of Greek and Persian texts, to make immeasurable
contributions to civilization, when modern Muslims instead are the
most uneducated of peoples and are bent on the destruction of historical
sites (à la Taliban)? How is it that Spain was made a Muslim
country by Tariq ibn Ziyad to protect Iberian civilization from the
Visigoths when Muslims now murder innocent civilians by the thousands?
What conditions were able to create great scholars such as Abu-Hanifah,
who set the basis for the Hanafi madhan (school of thought) from what
was before a disorganized system of informal law? What is missing
from the soul of Muslims today that lit the hearts of our ancestors?
More importantly, why is the current Islamic revival movement so flawed
and blind to these problems?
There is a systemic rot that has paralyzed Muslim societies across
the globe. So widespread is this contagion that few of us even understand
the two forces that keep us in darkness: ignorance of our own history,
religion and law and a complete lack of freedom to question things.
Those of us now free in the West with some experience of living in
the Muslim world, especially in repressive dictatorships, can probably
understand more clearly what my point is. None of these points are
addressed in the rhetoric of the reformists, or reactionary Islamic
parties in the Muslim world. My final point is that it is up to Muslims
in the West to show our brethren, mired in poverty and ignorance,
the way to prosperity and peace.
______________________
What
is missing from the soul of Muslims today
that lit the hearts of our ancestors?
______________________
While Muslims of all cultures can point to periods of brilliance in
their past, often the memory that is evoked is selective. We have
no idea how intolerant and hate-filled we have become until we have
examined the historical record. The MSA at the University of Toronto
has been running an excellent speaker series on the 800-year period
of Muslim rule in Spain, which many Western scholars acknowledge as
perhaps the earliest example of a truly pluralistic and harmonious
society. Enormous Islamic contributions to science and philosophy
were made alongside the greatest flowering of Jewish philosophy and
literature in history. This was repeated in Ottoman Turkey, where
a policy of multiculturalism allowed vast swaths of Eastern Europe
to remain proudly Christian until modern times and where many post-Inquisition
Jews settled. We forget the example of two cities that were ruled
by Muslims for 700 years: Athens and Delhi. Both retained their original
religious character under Islamic guardianship. Compare this to modern
times where Christian and some other Gulf nationalities are jailed
for practising their religion or where attacks against Jews increase
every year. Philosophers in the courts of Baghdad, Istanbul and Delhi
were free to debate a wide range of religious issues, but now questioning
even minor aspects of faith can incur the wrath of conservatives and
cost you your life. A fundamental and constricting intolerance chokes
the heart of the modern Muslim and makes him immune to reason, prone
to violence, and unable to reform.
In our intolerance, we have forgotten the basis of much of the law
that constitutes sharia. Part of the blame can be seen in historical
events, where Muslims have been grappling with change imposed by outsiders
throughout the last two centuries of the colonial period. From shocks
like the Mongol destruction of Baghdad in 1258 and the end of the
Ottoman caliphate in 1924, there has been considerable damage to the
quality of Islamic discourse. If we compare, it takes a modern Anglican
Christian priest several years of university graduate level training,
plus practical work in churches, to become a member of the clergy.
For a member of the Muslim ulema (community of legal scholars of Islam),
the training period is considerably less, and in some cases in Pakistan,
it is shortened to a matter of weeks. Where the ulema of 18th-century
Isfihan, Persia courted philosophy and science with religion, most
modern scholars cannot live up to this legacy. Given this
state, it is not surprising that many popular Islamic movements advocate
a return to the ideal time of the Medinan period, the time of the
Prophet, and to the value of the Quran and the Sunna (body of
traditional social and legal customs and practice that constitutes
proper observance of Islam). It would be nice if that were so, for
surely there could not have been a more exciting and dynamic time
in Muslim history but human nature can corrupt even the most
pure of messages. There is no better example than that of the Taliban
of Afghanistan. In 1996 they captured Kabul and brought their brand
of Islam to prominence in the world. It was marked with an extremely
literal interpretation of the Quran and the Sunna which included
flogging men who shaved, preventing women from going to work, and
other interesting twists. This return to basics approach
is a common theme in many Islamic movements, from the FIS in Algeria,
the Ikhwan in Egypt to the Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan. It is also
complete unhistorical, not supported by any past Islamic government,
and has been destructive and divisive at all times in our history.
Only the total collapse of proper Islamic education could have allowed
this half-educated opinion to propagate throughout the world. So pervasive
is this mentality that true Islamic practice is based solely on a
literal reading of just the Quran and Sunna that we even forget
the role of the most speculative branches of Islam in converting much
of the Muslim world. If you are of South Asian, African, Turkish or
Indonesian origin (i.e. over 70% of Muslims), chances are Islam was
spread to your ancestors by Sufi mystics and their followers. They
retained the flexibility to adapt Islam to local practices, made the
beauty and simplicity of the worship of Allah appealing to countless
millions, and made Islam the world force it is now. We disown that
heritage today; we scorn them and their ways and relegate them to
the margins of disbelief.
______________________
How
can we protest the ban on the hijab (headscarf) in France
when Muslim countries force women to wear it?
______________________
A cause of this ignorance and inability to countenance disagreement
can be blamed on a complete lack of freedom. The word is not some
cliché to be used by your favourite superpower in its actions
overseas. It is a difficult concept to understand, but the essence
is that you can make decisions in your life and, for our purposes,
in the manner of your faith, free from the fear of harm physical
or psychological. It is also the freedom to question, to probe, to
investigate, to test the limits. We Muslims in the West are probably
best positioned to comment on this. It was our parents (or ourselves)
who escaped the decay of Muslim societies in the Old World to make
a better life here. Many conservatives in Muslim countries think the
idea of freedom, along with democracy and capitalism, is some kind
of Western alien imposition that should be rejected. Besides the fact
that most of these groups have no coherent alternative to this model
(a recently elected religiously conservative government in Pakistan
decided that banning music and movies took priority over education,
health care, and poverty alleviation), one should remember that the
most free and capitalistic societies a thousand years ago were Muslim.
It was Muslims in Spain and then Turkey who welcomed the refugee intellectuals
and minorities of Europe and Muslims who pioneered international banking
and commerce systems. Finally, it was Muslim scholars who preserved
ancient Greek knowledge, including the Athenian experience of democracy,
that was later transmitted to Europe. Truly thinking freely involves
asking tough questions about ourselves: what is the future of Muslims
in the West? Why is it that Muslims form the poorest, least educated
strata of world society? Where do your loyalties lie in a conflict
between the West and a Muslim country? How can we protest the ban
on the hijab (headscarf) in France when Muslim countries force women
to wear it?
A tough road lies ahead for the Muslims of the present age. On the
one hand is the hostility of some non-Muslims who fear and despise
us; on the other are those within our faith who would hold us hostage
to violence, condemn us as heretics and blame others for problems
that have internal solutions. All I ask is that each individual keep
an open mind, be sceptical of world conspiracy theories, learn the
value of history, especially that concerning our forebears and the
application of Sharia, and never stop asking questions.
This
article first appeared in the Muslim Voice, a non-profit magazine
published by the Muslim Students Association at the University
of Toronto.
Kashif Pirzada is a fourth-year medical student at the University
of Toronto.
This
website: Copyright © 2005 Dream
World Media, LLC. / Urban Mozaik Magazine. All rights reserved.
The opinions expressed in Urban Mozaik Magazine are not necessarily
those of Urban Mozaik Magazine and the publisher cannot be held responsible
for them. This website/publication, in whole or in part, may not be
reproduced without written permission from the publisher.