|
|
Though
often unmentioned except in family circles, this biological legacy has
been shared by such figures as Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King
Jr., Langston Hughes, Lena Horne, Alice Walker, Jesse Jackson, Michael
Jackson and L.L. Cool J. Today virtually every African American family
tree boasts an Indian branch.
________________________________________________
There in the misty dawn of the Americas two peoples of color
began to meet in slave huts, on tobacco and cotton plantations,
and as workers in dank mines.
________________________________________________
This
uniquely "only in America" relationship began with the earliest
foreign landings in the New World. From Nova Scotia to Cape Horn,
and along the jewel-like islands of the Caribbean, Europeans imposed
a slave system first on Native Americans. Then, as millions of Indian
fell victim to overwork, disease and brutality, kidnapped Africans
began to take their places.
There in the misty dawn of the Americas two peoples of color began
to meet in slave huts, on tobacco and cotton plantations, and as workers
in dank mines. For two centuries Indians and Africans remained enslaved
together, and Native Americans were not exempted from the system until
after the Revolution. Scholar C. Vann Woodward has concluded "If
the black-red interbreeding was anywhere as extensive as suggested
by the testimony of ex-slaves, then the monoracial concept of slavery
in America requires revision."
The African-Indian connection also adds a sharp new dimension to the
issue of slave resistance. The first evidence of Native American and
African unity appears in a 1503 communication to Spains King
Ferdinand from Viceroy Nicolas de Ovando of Spains headquarters
on Hispaniola, now Haiti. Ovando complained that his enslaved Africans
"fled among the Indians and taught them bad customs and never
could be captured." In the last four words the governor is describing
more than a problem with untrustworthy servants or the difficulties
of retrieving runaways in a rainforest. From his thin line of white
colonies, he sees Europeans confronting a new biracial enemy that
has a base of support in the interior. The budding coalition has new
recruits joining each week.
Centuries before the Declaration of Independence talked of natural
rights and sanctioned rebellion against tyranny, African-Indian alliances
acted on these concepts as they pursued their American dream in the
mountains beyond the white settlements dotting the coastline. In 1537
Viceroy Mendoza of Mexico, lamenting an insurrection by Africans,
admitted "the Indians are with them." As slave revolts rocked
the new European outposts in the Americas, they also enjoyed Native
American support.
The very notion of "Black Indians" still has most whites
shaking their heads in disbelief or smiling at what appears to be
a joke, an unlikely play on words. No one remembers any such person
in a school text, western novel or Hollywood movie. None ever appeared.
Even in African American families Indian connections were occasionally
mentioned, but not as part of a historic process. Despite the vital
role of remembrance for people of color, a gallant heritage remained
hidden.
________________________________________________
In 1622 the colony of Jamestown, Virginia was attacked by Native Americans
but Africans were spared. In 1763 during Pontiacs Indian uprising
a Detroit resident reported that Native Americans killed whites
but were "saving and caressing all the Negroes they take."
________________________________________________
As
researchers traced African roots Indian connections could no longer
be ignored. In the 1920s Columbia University anthropologist Melville
J. Herskovits, renowned for documentation of African survivals in American
life, conducted interviews in New York, West Virginia and Washington,
D.C. which determined that a fourth to a third of African Americans
had Indian ancestors. Today in North American families the figure is
closer to 95%.
Scholars have uncovered fascinating glimpses of the historic legacy.
In 1622 the colony of Jamestown, Virginia was attacked by Native Americans
but Africans were spared. In 1763 during Pontiacs Indian uprising
a Detroit resident reported that Native Americans killed whites but
were "saving and caressing all the Negroes they take." He
worried lest this might "produce an insurrection." Chief Joseph
Brants Mohawks in New York welcomed runaway slaves and encouraged
intermarriage. Native American adoption systems knew no color line and
accepted the breathless fugitives as sisters and brothers. Woodsons
notion of an escape hatch notion proved correct: Indian villages welcomed
fugitives, and served as stations on the underground railroad.
In British North America each treaty with Native Americans provided
for the return of runaways. In 1721 the Governor of Virginia made the
Five Nations promise to return all fugitives; in l726 the Governor of
New York had the Iroquois Confederacy promise; in l746 the Hurons promised
and the next year the Delawares promised. Compliance was another matter.
According to scholar Kenneth W. Porter none of these nations returned
a slave. British officials also offered staggering rewards to Indians
who would hunt fugitives. In Virginia price was 35 deerskins, and in
the Carolinas it was three blankets and a musket.
To finally seal off Native American villages and make Indians partners,
British merchants introduced Africans as slaves to the Five Nations
Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks and Seminoles. Though less than
3% of Indian people owned slaves, bondage created destructive cleavages
in their villages and promoted a class hierarchy based on "white
blood." Indians of mixed white blood stood at the top, "pure"
Indians next, and people mixed with of African descent were at the bottom.
In 1860 Indian populations figures over a 30-year period showed a decline
ranging from 20% to 40%, but the numbers of slaves had increased to
2,511 for the Cherokees, 2,344 for the Choctaws 1,532 for the Creeks
and 975 for the Chickasaws. Slavery had become a major economic factor
in each nation.
Force, division and law threatened but failed to end Black- Indian friendships.
Thomas Jefferson discovered among the Mattaponies of Virginia "more
negro than Indian blood." The city of Los Angeles was founded in
1781 by forty-four people of whom all but two were African, Indian or
a mixture of the two peoples. In the 1830s frontier artist George Catlin
described "Negro and North American Indian, mixed, of equal blood"
as "the finest built and most powerful men I have ever yet seen."
Once away from European rule, African and Native American men and women
found they had more in common than a foe wielding muskets and whips.
Scholar Claude Levi-Strauss found both peoples had "precise knowledge"
and "extreme familiarity with their biological environment,"
and gave it "passionate attention." Dr. Theda Perdues
study of the Cherokee nation found that red and black people saw the
spiritual and environmental as one, and common activities such as rising
in the morning, hunting and curing illness as imbued with religious
significance. Mountains and hills represented divinities; people, animals
and plants carried lifes messages; religion was not reserved for
Sundays, but a matter of daily reflection.
________________________________________________
Both peoples rejected pursuit of worldly treasures,
and allowed kinship rather than ownership to dictate economic,
social and judicial decisions and marital customs.
________________________________________________
Indians and Africans both sought to live harmoniously with nature, cherished
kinship, stressed cooperation and created economies based on subsistence
agriculture. Both peoples rejected pursuit of worldly treasures, and allowed
kinship rather than ownership to dictate economic, social and judicial
decisions and marital customs. Individual roles were subservient to and
flowed from transcendent community duties.
By l860 African Americans had so thoroughly mixed with Native Americans
throughout the Atlantic seaboard, that white legislators wanted to revoke
their tax exemptions. In the Oklahoma Indian Territory 18% of the Cherokees,
Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles and Creeks were of African descent.
The Seminole nation made the most rapid adjustment to emancipation, electing
six Black members to its first post-war governing Council. Black Seminoles
began to build homes, churches, schools and businesses. Cherokees and
Creeks moved toward equality somewhat slower and Choctaws and Chickasaws
slower yet.
Whatever unfairness African Americans felt living among Indians, they
knew did not compare with what they could expect from southern whites.
"The opportunities for our people in that [Indian] country far surpassed
any of the kind possessed by our people in the U.S., " wrote editor
O.S. Fox of the Cherokee Afro-American Advocate . His people knew that
they lived among Indian men and women who would never brutalize or lynch
their sons and daughters.
It is impossible to say to which human family we belong. The larger part
of the native population has disappeared, Europeans have mixed with Indians
and the Negroes, and the Negroes have mixed with the Indians. We are all
born of one mother America, though our fathers had different origins.
This dissimilarity is of the greatest significance.
Many people of African descent found escape and some located their American
dream among Native Americans. Together two peoples of color became the
first freedom-fighters of the Americas. Their courageous contribution
to our legacy of resistance to tyranny deserves greater recognition.
©
Copyright 2001, William Loren Katz
 |
|
William
Loren Katz is the award-winning author of almost forty books on
African Americans, Native Americans and other U.S. minorities and
their various interactions, including the classic study, BLACK INDIANS:
A HIDDEN HERITAGE, and the eight-volume A HISTORY OF MULTICULTURAL
AMERICA widely used in school classrooms. Further information about
his books and lectures can be found at his website: www.williamlorenkatz.com
|
This
website: Copyright © 2000 Studio Q Int'l Inc / Urban Mozaik Magazine.
All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in Urban Mozaik Magazine are
not necessarily those of Urban Mozaik Magazine and the publisher cannot
be held responsible for them. This website/publication, in whole or in
part, may not be reproduced without written permission from the publisher.
|
|
|